Post by xyz3000 on Feb 12, 2024 1:15:39 GMT -5
A group of lawyers who claim to represent 6,000 creditors of the bankrupt company Fazendas Reunidas Boi Gordo, presented the president of the Court of Justice of São Paulo, judge Luiz Tâmbara, with a letter asking for the company's bankruptcy process to be speeded up. The group suggested that the Boi Gordo case files be sent to the recently created two specialized bankruptcy courts. He also recalled that with the entry into force of the new Bankruptcy Law, the average number of monthly cases fell from 300 to 70, which also creates the expectation of greater speed in the actions claimed. For the Boi Gordo case to be forwarded to a Bankruptcy Court, an amendment must be made to Resolution 200/2005 of the Special Body of the Court of Justice, allowing cases with a considerable number of creditors and liabilities that are also higher in real terms to be redistributed to the Courts.
Specialized and have a faster procedure. A proposal to this effect was delivered to the President of the Court of Justice. Entities in the legal profession, such as OAB-SP and Iasp — Instituto dos Advogados de São Paulo, have also made representations to the court in the same direction. Read the letter and the draft Resolution presented by the lawyers to the TJ-SP : His Excellency Judge Luiz Elias Tâmbara DD. President Estonia Email List of the Egregio Court of Justice of the State of São Paulo The lawyers signing this, members of the Law Firms: Caiuby Guimarães Advogados Asssociados (Ivan Caiuby Neves Guimarães); Di Pierro and De Gennari, Lawyers (Elisabeth V. De Gennari); Almeida Paiva Law Firm (JA Almeida Paiva); Lemos e Associados Advocacia (Cecília Bicca); Luiz Carlos Lyra Ranieri; Luiz Roberto de Arruda Sampaio; Schivartche Advogados (José Paulo Schivartche);being processed by the MM.1st Central Civil Court.
As is public and well known, the bankrupt initially requested a Preventive Concordat in the Comarca of Comodoro-MT, on having come to the Capital of São Paulo, under a successful Writ of Mandamus, filed by one of the signatories of this.In the second case, the architect's heirs rebelled against the state government, who wanted to list it and, as in the case of the banker, remove residents from their residence. The attitude was considered a “dispossession of private property” and an illegal act. The heirs won in every instance, until reaching the STF, which guaranteed compensation due to indirect expropriation.The decision is from the 1st Section of the Superior Court of Justice. Idec filed a Motion for Declaration against the decision that ordered the decentralization of actions.
Specialized and have a faster procedure. A proposal to this effect was delivered to the President of the Court of Justice. Entities in the legal profession, such as OAB-SP and Iasp — Instituto dos Advogados de São Paulo, have also made representations to the court in the same direction. Read the letter and the draft Resolution presented by the lawyers to the TJ-SP : His Excellency Judge Luiz Elias Tâmbara DD. President Estonia Email List of the Egregio Court of Justice of the State of São Paulo The lawyers signing this, members of the Law Firms: Caiuby Guimarães Advogados Asssociados (Ivan Caiuby Neves Guimarães); Di Pierro and De Gennari, Lawyers (Elisabeth V. De Gennari); Almeida Paiva Law Firm (JA Almeida Paiva); Lemos e Associados Advocacia (Cecília Bicca); Luiz Carlos Lyra Ranieri; Luiz Roberto de Arruda Sampaio; Schivartche Advogados (José Paulo Schivartche);being processed by the MM.1st Central Civil Court.
As is public and well known, the bankrupt initially requested a Preventive Concordat in the Comarca of Comodoro-MT, on having come to the Capital of São Paulo, under a successful Writ of Mandamus, filed by one of the signatories of this.In the second case, the architect's heirs rebelled against the state government, who wanted to list it and, as in the case of the banker, remove residents from their residence. The attitude was considered a “dispossession of private property” and an illegal act. The heirs won in every instance, until reaching the STF, which guaranteed compensation due to indirect expropriation.The decision is from the 1st Section of the Superior Court of Justice. Idec filed a Motion for Declaration against the decision that ordered the decentralization of actions.
